I've been dealing with some serious issues regarding my Backflow Preventer. It's failed its annual test three times in the past, but every follow-up test showed it was working fine. The first time it failed, the tester wanted to replace it for a hefty fee, but he left before I could discuss it and never billed me. Now, the city says I HAVE to replace the Backflow Preventer with a new model if it fails again. The catch? It can't be repaired or replaced in its current location by the meter. It has to be above ground in the middle of my yard, which is a problem since the guidelines state it needs to be at specific distances from trees and bushes. So, there's no suitable spot on my property! Their only solution is for me to spend $10,000-$20,000 to locate and cap an existing well to keep the same valve. It feels like they're just making things harder for homeowners without showing any concern. Any thoughts on how to handle this?
2 Answers
This sounds super frustrating! First off, I totally get why you feel it's unfair. The city should really be more accommodating, especially if there's no other water source on your property. As for the layout issues, it might be worth reaching out to a local plumbing expert who specializes in backflow prevention. They might have some creative solutions or alternatives you haven't considered yet. Also, maybe getting a lawyer to review the city’s requirements could give you some leverage. Don't feel bad for standing up for your property's best interest!
I can see why you're upset! It sounds like the city is really making it tough for you. If your neighbors got away without a Backflow Preventer, perhaps you could gather evidence from them to support your case. And definitely consider getting a second opinion from another plumbing company. Sometimes, they can identify a loophole or alternative that helps you avoid those huge costs. Keep fighting for your rights—you're not alone in this!