Exterior vs. Interior Waterproofing: What’s the Best Choice for My Basement?

0
Asked By WaterSavvy987 On

I'm currently facing some issues with my basement: there's mold growing inside the bricks, efflorescence buildup, and cracks in the brickwork. While I haven't noticed any leaks, it tends to be quite humid down there. My house was built in the 1970s, and I've been looking into waterproofing options. I've read that exterior waterproofing is generally better than interior options, often labeled as just water management, but I'm still confused about how effective these solutions really are.

I've gathered quotes from contractors for both interior and exterior waterproofing. Interestingly, some contractors strongly favor internal waterproofing, highlighting its cost-effectiveness and suggesting that exterior options are more expensive, less reliable, and eventually fail due to clogs in the drainage pipes. They argue that many modern homes need both an exterior barrier and an interior solution to ensure longevity since the exterior system will eventually be compromised. However, I'm skeptical about their claims, especially given that I want at least 15-20 years of effectiveness.

Here are my burning questions: 1) Is interior waterproofing sufficient for my issues? 2) If I should go with exterior waterproofing as recommended by some, how can I be sure it's done properly and will actually work? I just want to make a well-informed financial decision without relying solely on a contractor's word.

1 Answer

Answered By NotJustAnotherUser44 On

You've got the right idea by considering both options. Start with landscaping and making sure your gutters are managed properly; moving water away from your basement is key before it gets to the foundation. A well-installed exterior system can definitely last longer than 5 years if it’s designed to be serviceable and inspectable. If you plan on finishing your basement, an interior system might be a good choice for aesthetics and control over humidity. But just keep in mind, both methods can be done poorly or well!

ConcernedHomeowner12 -

I totally agree! Spending 35K-50K for just 5-7 years of protection seems excessive when you could invest in something more sustainable.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.