I'm in the process of converting a tub into a shower in my single-story Florida home with concrete floors. I've received quotes for both a traditional tile installation at about $8500 and a high-end polymer/composite shower system for $12400 (or $10.5k without the door). The composite system comes with a lifetime warranty. While it exceeds my budget, I'm considering it if the benefits justify the cost, especially given the warranty and reputation of the installer. What are your thoughts on whether composite is a better long-term choice compared to tile?
3 Answers
As a contractor who's worked extensively with tile, I’m starting to lean towards composites too. They require way less maintenance, and waterproofing is more straightforward. With tile, so much depends on the initial installation. Composites also offer a sleek seamless appearance that many people like. In the long run, you might actually save money and time with composites compared to constant tile maintenance. Just weigh your options and preferences before diving in!
I’ve never seen composites used much in the US, but they’re common in the UK and EU. They do offer less grout hassle, which is a plus. Just keep in mind they might scratch more easily than tile. Overall, they could be a good compromise if you want fewer grout lines and easier maintenance, but make sure you get it installed right!
I love the look of tile when it's freshly installed, but here’s the catch: long-term maintenance can be a nightmare. Grout stains and mold become real issues, especially in Florida’s humidity. If the prep isn’t flawless, you could be in for leaks down the line too. On the other hand, composite systems, while less visually compelling, are designed to be waterproof, super easy to clean, and if installed correctly with a solid warranty, it’s a worry-free investment. If your budget allows, going composite would save you a ton of hassle. I say go for it if you're not keen on constant upkeep!