I'm currently looking to replace two leaking windows and I've had some contractors come to give me quotes. Most of them recommended standard replacement windows at around $1,000 each. However, one contractor suggested installing a new frame with a nail fin method, which would cost about $2,000 per window, specifically using Anderson 100 windows. We also have some dry rot around the exterior of the house that we'll be fixing after we install these new windows. Since we plan to stay in our home for a long time, I'm considering the advantages of removing the entire old frame to inspect for any internal rot and opting for a complete new frame and window that could last over 30 years. What do you all think - is the new frame installation worth the extra cost, or should I just go with replacement windows?
3 Answers
Fixing that dry rot is crucial before you put in new windows. I totally agree, don’t go cheap. Yes, they can be pricey, but the durability and long-term benefits are worth every penny!
Don't skimp on your windows! I recommend going with the new construction method; just make sure to properly address the rot before installation. Retrofit may seem fine, but in the long run, you'll be glad you chose the new construction option.
Using nail fin is definitely the best route to take! The only time you'd consider a retrofit is if your roof overhangs a lot and your windows rarely face harsh weather. You're better off investing in a solid installation.